OUR SECURITY MUST NOT TRUMP OUR LIBERTY!
February 9, 2013 By Jack Jodell.
“Every American has the right to know when their government believes that it is allowed to kill them.”
- Oregon Senator Ron Wyden -
THANK GOD for Ron Wyden! He is perhaps the only American in Congress to clearly grasp the horrible implications of the recently released secret “white paper” the Obama administration has used to “justify” its use of deadly drones to attack and kill not only suspected al Qaeda members, but hundreds of innocent civilians as well. It is a sad and sorry indictment on my country to see that it has devolved to the point where it wantonly and carelessly dismisses these tragic deaths as mere “collateral damage” supposedly justified by the obsessive need to promote and defend ”liberty.” We have been obsessed with our security ever since the tragic 9/11 attacks which occurred more than 11 years ago!Rather than merely making us become more cautiously watchful, this unhealthy and overboard obsession has led us into two very costly and draining wars, one of them completely unnecessary and the other becoming a long quagmire. I apologize to the rest of the world and especially to the victims’ friends and families for the murderous callousness as well as the condescending arrogance of my countrymen and their government.
I fully recognize that my country remains engaged in a war against terrorism that it never asked for, and that, in war, there are inherent and often necessary negative side effects. I recognize that al Qaeda is a savage and brutal lot which has little to do with honest practitioners of Islam. Yet I am filled with sorrow and regret at the thought of my President regularly sitting with his security staff to decide whom they will kill in the next drone attack, and that those invariably killed in the crossfire will callously be dismissed as mere collateral damage.. It gnaws at my very soul that my countrymen are accepting this as a normal and necessary occurrence when in fact it is often indiscriminate murder. It bothers me even more that this is being conducted not only against foreigners but that the right to do this is supposedly reserved for the President to use even against American citizens like you or I, whom he believes are helping the terrorists! This smacks of old wild west vigilante-ism. The only real difference I see is that, in the old west, it was considered unmanly and even cowardly to shoot your opponent in the back while he wasn’t looking.
Whatever became of the writ of habeas corpus – the right of a supposedly free person to notified of a specific charge and be given a fair trial before a jury of his or her peers before he or she is to be meted out justice for their supposed crime? Who gave the President the moral right to act as judge, jury, and executioner in the complete absence of such a trial? Who gave the President the authority to exact this “justice” on an unknowing, unsuspecting, and possibly even innocent person?Both Hitler and Stalin held at least show trials before passing sentence on their victims! We justifiably accused each of them of committing war crimes for the mass murders they caused. Is what we are engaged in today all that different?
In this writer’s humble opinion, there is no justification whatsoever in the President assuming such power. Such an extra-constitutional action would have been unthinkable in previous times. We as a nation have often faced danger from abroad. Hitler, Tojo, and Stalin were all committed to our destruction, and they had the armies and possible wherewithal to achieve their aim. Yet never once, in our attempt to defend ourselves against them, did we ever stoop to such depravity as that which we are engaged in during this current threat. We never tortured our prisoners of war as DICK Cheney was so fond of doing, nor did we suspend our civil liberties for so long or as gravely as we have done during our current post-9/11 war on terror. Of course, in previous times there were no neocons running the defense and intelligence efforts; saner, cooler heads were at the helm. What we are engaged in today is a neocon’s pre-emptive dream come true, and it is disgraceful. I n our current attempt to defend liberty and democracy we are destroying both and have become, in a very real sense, terrorists ourselves. It was Osama bin Laden’s avowed ambition to destroy western democracy, and he has succeeded, unbelievably, with our help!
Our Founding Fathers – literally ALL of them – are undoubtedly spinning in their graves in absolute shock and horror at this wicked development. It us high time for us to return to sanity, fairness, and democracy. Our security must NOT trump our liberty!




6 Comments
Technology has given us the ability to kill remotely, with a thumbs up or down from just a small group of people. A Star Chamber that has no checks and balances. They alone decide but also they alone feel that the criteria for making that decision must remain secret. The most basic of rights, life, can be taken without a trial. Those killed by drones are not just terrorists, but innocents. A 16 year old American citizen was killed by a drone strike
Our technology gives us the ability but our wisdom in it’s use is sorely lacking. Dark days in our country indeed!
David,
Thpse last two sentences sum it all up brilliantly. We have entered a very sinister age. I am heartsick over it.
Wait…
You’re telling me that somebody in Congress, that bunch with hundreds of members, half of whom are lawyers, only took a couple of years to start talking about this?
I am afraid we have forgotten the point Ben Franklin was making–Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
I can see, in my mind’s eye, our founding fathers weeping for what this country has become and is becoming. We have strayed so far from the original intent, I fear we will never return. This country was not established to be the world bully, imposing our politics and beliefs on other nations. We were not established to meddle in the affairs of other nations or peoples. I doubt that they even thought of us as a beacon of freedom, they mostly just wanted to be left alone to live and let live. I know times have changed since the 1700s and we have been thrust into a global role, but bullying, badgering, intimidation, threats and extortion were not in our nature until after the collapse of the Soviet Union when we realized we were the dog left standing. This seems to have gone to our heads and we, as a nation, have lost our minds as well as our souls.
Time has come to reject this attitude of American Execptionalism before we choke on it. I’m sure all the empires before us felt the same exceptionalism in their own times and now we pick over their bones and put them in museums. Wonder who will be picking over our bones and writing our history in some museum display of the future. And what will they say about us?
I really appreciate your listing of the TRUTH, Jack. Ms. Peck puts it very well when she quotes Franklin. I don’t necessarily think we must adhere to what our ‘founding fathers’ had in mind per governance. (frankly, gosh help us if we did) I do think that as a ‘progressive’ society we have failed. We are in atrophy by a majority ignorance ignited and supported by a muscled in plutocracy. Your post points it out well!
My comments regarding the ‘founding fathers’ did not mean to imply that we should return to the ways of the 1700s. My intent was to have the reader consider exactly what the founders intended and how far we have strayed from that idea. I do not believe they intended for this country to grow into the world’s bully, shoving our form of government down everyone else’s throats. I believe they envisioned a progressive, free and open society and they wrote provisions into the Constitution to allow for changing times and mores. The current stupidity over the right to own automatic weapons and the use of drones on innocent civilians and American citizens would, hopefully, draw their anger and censure. Not to mention the destructive methods of the Tea Party and friends.